
Maybe this will come in handy.
My final research paper is almost complete! I've been analyzing the public understanding of science in relationship to the disposition of supernumerary cryopreserved embryos after fertility treatment (what people will do with their excess embryos after they conceive: dispose, donate to another couple, donate to science or store indefinitely). What I have found is that most people we've talked to don't understand science well. At all. I found this too in an early study, about eight years ago, when I conducted interviews to see how well people understood genetic modification. This makes the new genetically modified embryo report doubly interesting.
From the site: The Audible Picture Show is a growing collection of works by a diverse range of people responding to the challenge of creating short works of audio for 'a dark cinema'.
According to a Wall Street Journal article reprinted here, more than 200 schools of nursing plan to offer a doctoral program that will train advanced practice nurses to hone their medical skills toward those of primary care physicians. This Doctorate of Nursing Practice will require a certification exam "based on the same test physicians take to qualify for a medical license" and could begin as early as fall 2008. "By 2015, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing aims to make the doctoral degree the standard for all new advanced practice nurses." I am curious about what effect this will have on current nursing practice, specifically for newly qualified and practicing advanced practice nurses who do not hold a Ph.D., and how the hierarchy will organize itself around these new educational delineations. Not to mention that we're potentially crossing some seriously established boundaries here. Nurses become nurses because they want to nurse. If we wanted to practice medicine, we'd become doctors. And doctors don't want nurses to be doctors, not to mention "mini-doctors". It will be interesting to see how this one pans out.
The documentary The Business of Being Born (Rikki Lake & Abby Epstein) has been made available for viewing online. That's nice. What's not so nice is the message. I wanted to like this movie, I really did. But as my partner and I sat down to watch, it was pretty clear within the first two minutes that all of the positive popular press this movie has received has been seriously undeserved, and worse, uncritical. (A crucial exception is this Slate piece.) Not only did I not like this movie for its dubious historical, epidemiological and professional commentary on birth in the United States, I also didn't like that it was horribly elitist, classist and, yes, racist. This in all of the worst ways that information packaged for general consumption can be: coercively.My partner referred to it as the NY/LA “boutique” image of the perfect childbirth. Of course, we all want women to have this intervention-free option. But for some of us, there may not be the luxury of an uncomplicated pregnancy and childbirth. And that can make us feel like we've lost control. It became pretty clear by Rikki's third hat change and overly dramatic forward-leaning, finger chapelling attentiveness, that this movie was primarily about women trying to either regain or maintain that control. Not until I was 1 hour and 9 minutes into the movie did I realize that it was not about control of one’s own childbirth experience, as the film lauds, but about control of other women and their experience. Sadly, 'expert' clinicians are also used to meet this end. At one point in the film, Dr. Michel Odent (the OB who also believes men should not be present at childbirth) makes the claim that when a woman gives birth by “caesarean section she does not release [the natural] flow of "love hormones" [oxitocin], so she is a different woman than if she had given birth naturally...and the first contact between mother and baby is different.” Here Odent compares women to monkeys who will reject their babies if delivered by c-section. Upon hearing this, I quite astonished myself and my poor partner, by bursting into tears.
Childbirth is a wonderful, moving, emotional, life-changing event for every woman; the amazing birth footage in this documentary attests to that. What is worrisome, however, is the shocking amount of misinformation the film conveys about childbirth, accompanied by a self-affirming (and often righteous) adamance about the importance of the “right” birth and becoming the “right” kind of mother. This is interspersed with an extreme lack of criticality in regard to the 'big picture' of various practices by those interviewed, including women, social scientists and health care providers. (I should say here that there was a striking absence of L&D nurses in this movie. Not one was interviewed!). Neither was there even a smattering of sympathy for women who have births that don’t go as planned. As a twenty-five year-old first time mom, I had a complicated pregnancy and The Kid was, in the end - thankfully - delivered safely to my arms by cesarean section. But I have known women who have had horrifically complicated pregnancies necessitating close monitoring of both mom and baby; mothers who have had perfectly normal pregnancies and lost their babies in what seemed to begin as an uncomplicated birth; husbands and children who have lost their wives and mothers because of unforeseen problems.
The empowerment of women is not as simple as demedicalizing childbirth. But it is as simple as avoiding shaming women into taking chances for fear of being a “bad mother.” Empowering women doesn't mean demanding we all make the same choices and become the same kinds of mothers; it means allowing us to empower ourselves to become the mothers we choose to be.
Good news: On May 1st the House passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) by a vote of 414 to 1. The act will protect Americans against discrimination based on their genetic information. This will apply to both health insurance and employment. The legislation has been debated in Congress for the past 13 years, so most individuals with genetic diseases and their families -- especially those parents of children with genetic illnesses -- are celebrating. This bill, additionally supported by NIH National Human Genome Research Institute, will also allow for continuation of biomedical research by eliminating the possibility for genetic discrimination. And, yes, this legislation is supported by George Bush who will sign it into law tomorrow.
I've had some inquiries about getting into MEPN, as in, how the heck that works. To be honest, I have no idea. But I can give a simple synopsis of my own history; maybe it will help in some way. Here it is, abridged. I have significant hands-on health care experience, though it is rather ancient (we're talking twelve years past). Because of this, any volunteer or health related jobs I held in the interim, I mentioned in my application. I have a graduate degree in a related field, a few publications under my belt, some first-authored and some in medical journals, and -- this came up again and again on interview day and in conversations with faculty -- I have experience and expertise in a particular area. That is to say, I have access and demonstrated commitment to a particular community. Having worked in reproductive technologies and women's health for about ten years may have been the single deciding factor in my entry to the advanced practice perinatal nursing specialty. As for the initial decision, GPA and GRE scores are kind of like the limbo bar: if you make it under, you go on to the next round. It seems that both the statement of purpose and (strong) letters of recommendation focusing on your proposed area/community are imperative. Beyond that, as far as I can tell, it's a total crap shoot.
I'm in a bit of a funk right now over circus. I've been active with the center for going on two years; I am not -- and have no interest in becoming -- a professional. (After all, I'm a mom, an ____ologist, researcher, and I'm about to become a nurse!). Granted, I am not the most self-confident person on the planet. And while I like to think of this as humility, I am fundamentally aware that it oftentimes manifests as self- consciousness and self-doubt. So, there's that. But the thing that's getting to me is what any good teacher knows well: the best way to help a student to learn is to be encouraging and to help to build confidence. I am not always getting this feedback at my place of practice. I should say here that I am not shabby, in general, at the art of circus. (Though, I don't hold a candle to The Kid.)
Over at NursingZen I was a bit disheartened to read that the Dean of the School of Nursing at UCSF has made the somewhat dire statement to outgoing nursing students that San Francisco is "the only place in the country that has no nursing shortage". Economists do seem to be projecting a lull in the immediate need for new nurses. Some other analysts are telling us it's not so.




I had a cardio conditioning class at the circus center two nights ago, and now I am hurting all over. A class taught by circus folk is very different than the traditional aerobic experience: think Jane Fonda at Burning Man + steroids and a heavy-duty stimulant (she was drug free, of course, she just had way more strength, energy and spirit than your average Betty). Needless to say, I almost expired.
I have a pretty great partner. Monday, he got me this hard to find Palace record. Tuesday he rented another classic film noir which was the most far-out movie experience I've had in a while. Today, aware of my interest in chronicling feminism, he sent me this piece by Rebecca Walker, estranged daughter of Alice, with the accompanying message: Hi Sweets, here is the article about Alice Walker's daughter that I was mentioning to you....It is sad article overall, but there are some interesting asides about the ideological struggle to keep feminism pure despite real world issues like motherhood, etc. Am I lucky or what? What better than a man who understands the contradictions of feminism?
Granted, circus girls look a lot like this, which is to say circus bodies are not traditionally feminine nor particularly skinny. And that's a big change for some. But other women around me seem even more singularly-minded. Today alone (it's noon) I've heard one woman, weighing maybe 90 pounds soaking wet, say she was having a "juice" for lunch "because I have to watch my calories" (?) while another of similar proportion told me, "All I do is eat. Look at me." I wanted to say, "I can hardly see you."
My tissu teacher (who is great, by the way) has been trying to get me to keep a notebook so that I will remember the different wraps and drops. My take on this is that for chronicling what we've done week to week, this is a fine exercise, but for learning, it is an exercise in futility. As a former dancer I have pretty decent body awareness. I am aware that my body learns through repetition. The trouble is that at the circus center, other than during class, there is no way to practice because the silks are not hanging. I maintain that without this repetition, I will make slow gains and will, likely, need to be reminded of where my feet, hands, butt should go. But this argument was putting me at odds with my instructor, so I conceded and whipped out the handy dandy moleskine, with a mental note to check up on this one. I recalled a piece I had seen in the NYT last year about a professional dancer who had a very detailed explanation of learning by watching and repeating movement, something which is quite natural for me - and imperative - in physical activity, even though I am much more of an auditory learner, generally.
The Kid has been sick for a pretty long time, off and on, with a number of ailments. Typical of an elementary school-aged child. Most recently, it's been a persistent cough which the pediatrician decided to try treating with qvar and albuterol. I reserved the latter since he has no signs of asthma. He did use the qvar inhaler. Vomited. The cough persists.
This single point trapeze has got me thinking about balance. After the first round, which was a solo lesson lasting about an hour, I felt pretty good. My instructor, mightily prepared with water, ginger, smelling salts and a bucket (just kidding about the last two), was very conscientious about checking up on my dizziness every few minutes: “How are you doing? Do you need some ginger? Drink some water.” And I was really fine. Until… I finished the class and made it all the way to work when I realized I felt exceedingly tired, had trouble focusing, was walking very slowly, methodically placing one foot in front of the other. I imagine I looked drunk, which is not the best way to appear at work. When I made it to my office, I sat at my desk, both feet placed firmly on the floor. With hands flat on my desk I stared straight ahead for about an hour. Then, quite suddenly, it passed. Now, how to combat the dizziness. This guy calls dizziness his idea of “absolute hell”. I wouldn’t go that far, obviously, or I wouldn’t be on the trapeze. But dizziness can be a real drag. So his remedies seem quite useful. Recommendations include: move slowly and find a focal point, stay hydrated, practice deliberate movement (walk a straight line), build focal strength (do exercises like following moving objects with your eyes). His final solution? Avoid dizziness-inducing activities. Heck no!